Re: [foxboro] The best of the Jungle!
- From: "Stear, Bo" <stear@xxxxxxx>
- To: "'foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 15:45:42 -0500
The way hardware and software goes through such rapid development, one =
can only try and keep up wherever possible. We now have 23 nodes on =
our system and have decided to move all of the software to version 6.3 =
for all of our AW/AP's and WP's and the v2k_01 software version for all =
of our controllers. So far, this release shows good stability and =
should serve us for at least the next five years. Moving to this =
release will eliminate your having to keep up with what software is on =
what controller and which quick fixes need to be applied.
Cost is a major factor in standardizing the rest of the hardware as far =
as workstations and other Sun products. We have a pretty good mixture =
of workstation hardware with 51B and 51D and 51E boxes. The =
'advantage' program allows an opportunity to get everything at the same =
level but this advantage disappears each time Invensys/Foxboro follows =
Sun into another box. All one can do is weigh the cost of training, =
spare parts, and maintenance on older hardware against the cost to =
upgrade. When these costs equal or surpass the 'latest and greatest', =
look to the horizon to see if something new is coming out before you =
jump onto the 'advantage' bandwagon. For example, right now might not =
be a good time to start upgrading since Solaris 8 is on the verge of =
being our new operating system for unix and that includes a NEW =
workstation processor type.
-----Original Message-----
From: Eudilson N=FA=F1ez Cossio =
[mailto:Eudilson.Nunez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 2:18 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [foxboro] The best of the Jungle!
Hi List,
We have several DCS Foxboro to make control in our petroleoum =
refinery.
Since Y2K remediation, the new projects suggest to install the last =
vesion
and now a day we have a jungle of version in software and hardware and
several quick fixes required for each version too.
My question is:=20
Based on your experiences what do you recommend to make a good
administration and support about the upgrades for this kind of systems =
in a
big distributed application as in our case?
Could you please suggest a good selection to standarize the system and
reduce the knowledge, spare parts, etc required for at lease 5 years?
For example we have (as a main description of our systems) the =
following
list:
Foxboro I/A vesions 4.3, 6.1, 6.1.2, 6.2.1
CP 10, 30, 40B, 60
AW, AP, WP Series 50, 51, 70 styles A, B, B1, D, E
Thank you very much for your concepts.
Sincerly,
Eudilson Nunez
=20
=20
___________________________________________________________________
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by The Foxboro Company.
Use the information obtained here at your own risk. For disclaimer,
see http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html#maillist
list info: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
___________________________________________________________________
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by The Foxboro Company.
Use the information obtained here at your own risk. For disclaimer,
see http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html#maillist
list info: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
