Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- From: brad.s.wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 12:38:26 -0400
We originally built our system ( one of the earliest IA ) using ladder
logic ... I found it easy to use and it kept all the interlock processing
at the FBM level. Unfortunately, being able to work with ladder logic seems
to be a dying art, and we're switching to non-ladder FBMs and GDEVs and
moving interlock processing to IND seq blocks in the CP. I don't like
loading up the CPs that way, but it was the only way I could get others to
understand what the interlocks were doing. Of course, we're all pre-200
series FBMs, so each card is limited to only 4 pumps and the IFLs wouldn't
be a problem with that.
Brad Wilson
ExxonMobil Chemical Co
Edison Synthetics Plant
732-321-6115
732-321-6177 fax
Brad.S.Wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
