Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- From: "Dirk Pauwels" <dirkpauwels_1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 15:27:38 +0000
That's interesting, I've never tried it either, the number of cout's is
still restricted to the FBM, but more ifl's offer more possible interlocks.
Rgds,
Dirk
>From: brad.s.wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Reply-To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
>Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 10:21:37 -0500
>
> >>> Martin Theobald wrote <<<
>Reading the documentation (Volume 3 of B0193AX - Rev N) suggests that each
>FBM can support up to eight PLB blocks. This is not a feature I have tried
>or seen used.
>
>Yes, we have a couple of FBMs with multiple PLBs, although I remember that
>there is a limit to the TOTAL number of lines in all PLBs running in an
>FBM. I seem to recall that the number of lines allowed in an FBM is the
>constant, regardless of the number of PLBs. But this would certainly allow
>for more IFLs & OFLs.
>
>Brad Wilson
>ExxonMobil Chemical Co
>Edison Synthetics Plant
>732-321-6115
>732-321-6177 fax
>Brad.S.Wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
>Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
>your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
>foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
>to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
>to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
_________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- From: Douglas G. Lloyd
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- From: brad . s . wilson
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- » Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- » Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- » Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- » Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- » Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- » Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- » Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- » Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- » Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- » Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- » Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- » Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- » Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- » Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- » Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- » Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- » Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- » Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- » Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- From: Douglas G. Lloyd
- Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM
- From: brad . s . wilson