David, Thank you, as this format is acceptable to the Control Configurator, but it does not secure the parameter like the INHIB example. I can still prohibit the individual block alarms from the select display. Why? Is my solution even a valid one? Joseph M. Riccardi, Inc. DCS Services - Industrial Process Control North-Central Office (OH, PA, MI, IN, WV Area) South-East Office (FL, GA, AL, SC, NC Area) Joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx "To give real service you must add something that cannot be bought or measured with money; and that is sincerity and integrity." - Donald A. Adams -----Original Message----- From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Johnson Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 4:12 PM To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [foxboro] Inhibit alarms; NOT Someone probably already answered this But C:B.INHALM.0000 It is expecting a 4 digit hex mask I tried it and it seems to work. Regards David PS does it show that I am looking for more interesting work than drawing displays? -----Original Message----- From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joseph M. Riccardi Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 4:01 PM To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [foxboro] Inhibit alarms; NOT Folks, This plant needs to prevent the inhibiting of certain (critical) alarms from the Select Display by operators; period. No way, no one (from an operational display), never, ... I thought it would be easy just to secure the INHIB parameter with C:B.INHIB.0. That worked at the block level, but the operators soon discovered that they could select the individual block alarms (Select/Alarms/HIABS, HHABS, etc.) and Toggle them to INHIBITED. So to prevent this, I thought I could just secure the INHALM parameter in the same way as the INHIB parameter. Since the INHALM parameter is a packed boolean (range 0-FFFFFFFF), I thought C:B.INHALM.0 would to the trick, but the Control Configurator will not accept it. What format/syntax is the INHALM parameter expecting? 0 should be a valid value; no? Or any other suggestions? Thanks in advance for your help ... PS. Yes, we are on a path to evaluate all alarms, but I need your help in the short term ... Joseph M. Riccardi, Inc. DCS Services - Industrial Process Control North-Central Office (OH, PA, MI, IN, WV Area) South-East Office (FL, GA, AL, SC, NC Area) Joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx "To give real service you must add something that cannot be bought or measured with money; and that is sincerity and integrity." - Donald A. Adams _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave