Re: [foxboro] ACTTOC in GDEV blocks

  • From: "Pauwels, Dirk - RSM" <Dirk.Pauwels@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:54:05 +0200

If you have a TOC and dev limits and DSR_RB =3D 1 then you should always
get the ACTTOC.

Rgds,

Dirk

-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Pirie, Sandra M
Sent: woensdag 19 april 2006 13:28
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [foxboro] ACTTOC in GDEV blocks


Hi List,
One example of a GDEV block for an ROV calculates the ACTTOC (actual
travel time) whilst another doesn't.  Is it because the DSR_RB is not
connected?

How can I get the ACTTOC calculation to work?

          Thanks,

                        Sandra.

=20
=20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=20
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
to unsubscribe:      =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
=20
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: