Re: [foxboro] ACCUM blocks again

  • From: "Normand Bergeron" <normandbergeron@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 16:16:43 +0000


A dirty way to get it would be to use an Ind block, convert the real to an 
ascii string, and dump this ascii string... I don't have a Fox system in 
front of me, but I thing the omget supports strings also...

Norm





>From: "Corey R Clingo" <clingoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [foxboro] ACCUM blocks again
>Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:13:08 -0600
>
>
>
>Yes, but:
>
>1) I'd have to go back and add the extra ones.  I don't know how many we
>have (50+ at least),  And after I did this, the reports would have to
>combine the results, and then I'd have to build additional points to
>combine the results on the workstation screens.
>
>2) It just bothers me that the detail displays can show the ACCUM.OUT in
>full precision, the Lotus add-in can do it, but I can't do it with omget.
>I shouldn't _have_ to build extra points.
>
>Corey
>
>
>
>
>|---------+---------------------------->
>|         |           stan             |
>|         |           <stanb@xxxxxxxx> |
>|         |           Sent by:         |
>|         |           foxboro-bounce@fr|
>|         |           eelists.org      |
>|         |                            |
>|         |                            |
>|         |           03/14/2003 09:29 |
>|         |           AM               |
>|         |           Please respond to|
>|         |           foxboro          |
>|         |                            |
>|---------+---------------------------->
>   
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>   |                                                                        
>                                                       |
>   |              To:  foxboro                                              
>                                                       |
>   |              cc:                                                       
>                                                       |
>   |       Subject:  Re: [foxboro] ACCUM blocks again                       
>                                                       |
>   
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>
>
>
>
>
>Just curious, couldn't you cascade 2 accumulators, and combine the results?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
>Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
>your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
>foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
>to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
>to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>


_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*   
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: