Re: [foxboro] 4 to 20 mA output tight closure conditions for valves

  • From: <D.Moras@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 00:53:53 +0000

Joseph,
I have considered I was hoping there was a simple parameter as I seen in other 
systems that could do the trick.  Scaling the output 0-20mA would do the job 
but it also has other scaling repercussions.
Thank you.
David

-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Joseph M. Riccardi
Sent: Monday, 8 July, 2013 8:57 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] 4 to 20 mA output tight closure conditions for valves

Have you considered scaling the 0-20madc scix; I think it is 1?

Joseph M. Riccardi
 
386-441-0250               Home Office
386-451-7607               Florida Cell

Joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
"To give real service you must add something that cannot be bought or measured 
with money; and that is sincerity and integrity." - Donald A. Adams

-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of D.Moras@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, July 7, 2013 11:21 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] 4 to 20 mA output tight closure conditions for valves

Hi,
Does anyone know if there is a Foxboro 4 to 20mA output option that causes the 
mA value to be forced below 4mA (simulated tight shut off condition) when the 
output of a controller is at 0%.  I have seen this as a standard option in 
other systems for some valves that don't tend to pinch off the best when at 
zero command (4mA), instead they stay partially open.  I'm wondering if 
something can be done in FOX to compensate Setting the LSCO1 parameter of the 
AOUT block to force the DCS output to drive below 4mA when the output command 
is at 0%, may do it but I looks messy.  It looks like changing the LSCO1 
parameter to a positive value will cause the RAWC value to drive the A/D 
converter safely below 4mA.  See example below.  Has anyone actually tried this.

SCO = 3: Inverse Linear (12800 to 64000) Analogue Output 4 to 20 mA RAWC = 
((OUT - LSCO1) * 51200/(HSCO1 - LSCO1)) + 12800

Signal conditioning setting (SCO) = 3, = 4 to 20mA


LSCO1

5.5

LSCO1

5.5

HSCO1

100

HSCO1

100

51200

Range of integer count

51200

Range of integer count

12800

Offset bias for integer count

12800

Offset bias for integer count

OUT

0

OUT

100

RAWC

9820.10582

RAWC

64000

RAWC@4mA<mailto:RAWC@4mA>

12800

RAWC@4mA<mailto:RAWC@4mA>

12800


0% output mA

3.068783069

100% output mA

20



Any views or a neater way to engineer this functionality?

Regards,

David


 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems 
(formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. 
Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 


 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems 
(formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. 
Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 


 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: