[foxboro] decision: Op panel's

From: "BrianLong" <blong@xxxxxxx>
To: "Foxboro" <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:57:56 -0600

In case anyone was wondering,  the best solution for us was to use our
existing Int30, add a PLC and tie multiple panelview's to that.  All field
wiring goes away and the PLC is just used as an interface between the I/A
and panelviews.   Adding display managers and industrial touch screen pc's
was considerably more expensive.
Brian Long
Arkansas Kraft


-----Original Message-----

From: BrianLong [mailto:blong@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 1:36 PM
To: BJL
Subject: FW: Op panel part 2



-----Original Message-----
From: BrianLong [mailto:blong@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 12:48 PM
To: Foxboro
Subject: Op panel part 2


Something I should have mentioned is that I have about 11 op panel's to
replace.  Most are very simple with just a couple analogs, inc/dec's, start/
stops.  I don't have that many display managers available nor would I want
to tie them up for a few points.  Any other idea's?

Thanks,
Brian Long
Arkansas Kraft


 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

[foxboro] decision: Op panel's

Other related posts: