[foxboro] decision: Op panel's
- From: "BrianLong" <blong@xxxxxxx>
- To: "Foxboro" <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:57:56 -0600
In case anyone was wondering, the best solution for us was to use our
existing Int30, add a PLC and tie multiple panelview's to that. All field
wiring goes away and the PLC is just used as an interface between the I/A
and panelviews. Adding display managers and industrial touch screen pc's
was considerably more expensive.
Brian Long
Arkansas Kraft
-----Original Message-----
From: BrianLong [mailto:blong@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 1:36 PM
To: BJL
Subject: FW: Op panel part 2
-----Original Message-----
From: BrianLong [mailto:blong@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 12:48 PM
To: Foxboro
Subject: Op panel part 2
Something I should have mentioned is that I have about 11 op panel's to
replace. Most are very simple with just a couple analogs, inc/dec's, start/
stops. I don't have that many display managers available nor would I want
to tie them up for a few points. Any other idea's?
Thanks,
Brian Long
Arkansas Kraft
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
- » [foxboro] decision: Op panel's