[foxboro] MATH vs CALCA loading
- From: "Jeremy Milum" <jmilum@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:26:00 -0500
I was perusing the CP60 loading spreadsheet and it appears that a MATH
block takes more processing than a CALCA. is this correct and why?
anyone know?
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- [foxboro] RE : MATH vs CALCA loading
- From: Doucet, Terrence
Other related posts:
- » [foxboro] MATH vs CALCA loading
- » [foxboro] RE : MATH vs CALCA loading
- [foxboro] RE : MATH vs CALCA loading
- From: Doucet, Terrence