RE: Fwd: This is a test message
- From: "Mark Fugatt" <markfu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 12:46:40 +0100
It depends on exactly what your SLA specifies, my client has two levels
in their SLA, one for mail functionality and one for mail content, so
they then use the dial-tone recovery method to meet the mail
functionality SLA and then use the Recovery Storage Group to meet their
mail content SLA.
Mark Fugatt
Dedicated Supportability Engineer (Exchange)
Microsoft Services Organisation
Microsoft Limited
Building 1, Floor 2, Zone F
Microsoft Campus
Thames Valley Business Park
Reading
RG6 1WG
markfu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.microsoft.com/uk/
MSN Messenger: markfu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Blog: http://www.msmvps.org/exchange <http://www.msmvps.org/exchange>
Work: +44(0)118 909 5630
Mobile: +44(0)7966 8581087
This email may contain confidential information. If you are not named
on the addressee list, please take no action in relation to this email,
do not open any attachment, and please contact the sender (details
above) immediately. Information in this email is provided in good
faith. If you are a customer of Microsoft, please refer to the terms
and conditions which cover the provision of support and consulting
services to you/your organization. If you are not corresponding in the
course of, or in connection with a Microsoft contract or program with
its own terms and conditions, please note that no liability is accepted
by Microsoft for the contents of this mail.
________________________________
From: Praveen Ramaswamy [mailto:ramaswamy_praveen@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 04 June 2005 11:05
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] RE: Fwd: This is a test message
http://www.MSExchange.org/
Thanks for your valuble information. It looks like 2 hour SLA is going
to be very costly.
Regards
Praveen R
Other related posts:
