Re: FE/BE vs standalone
- From: "Lara, Greg" <GLara@xxxxxxx>
- To: "'[ExchangeList]'" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:42:19 -0400
Here's the article:
A few basic concepts in disk sizing
http://blogs.msdn.com/exchange/archive/2004/10/11/240868.aspx
Greg
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
This e-mail message may contain privileged, confidential and/or proprietary
information intended only for the person(s) named. If you are not the
intended recipient, please destroy this message, and any attachments, and
notify the sender by return e-mail. If you are not the intended
recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the
message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, disclosure or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: Crockett, Gregory [mailto:Gregory.Crockett@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 4:27 PM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] Re: FE/BE vs standalone
http://www.MSExchange.org/
http://blogs.msdn.com/exchange/
Have fun!
greg
-----Original Message-----
From: Lara, Greg [mailto:GLara@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 11:45 AM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] Re: FE/BE vs standalone
http://www.MSExchange.org/
I agree with Al's points, and would like to point out something about
storage. As important as determining disk size is choosing the right
RAID
configuration for the various databases and logs. Not only the RAID
version,
but the number of spindles. There's a very interesting post about this
on
the Microsoft Exchange Team blog at http://blogs.msdn.com. I'll post the
exact link later when I have access to it.
Greg
Other related posts:
