RE: Eseutil

From: "Mark Dewell" <M.Dewell@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 16:18:55 +0100

I would begin with the smallest database (should be quickest and hence
minimum disruption to users) and then estimate the time required for the next
largest database based on the time taken for the first. The more databases
you do the more accurate your estimates will become. 
 
 
 -----Original Message-----
From: Roberts Phillip (IBM) [mailto:RobertsP@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: 03 September 2002 13:41
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] Eseutil



        http://www.MSExchange.org/
        

        What is a good way to estimate the downtime that will be needed to
run eseutil? We are a 24x7 shop and downtime has to be kept to a minimum, so
I need to be able to tell users how long email will be unavailable.

        Thanks, 

        Phillip B. Roberts 
        Network Administrator 
        Thomson 
        24200 U.S. Route 23, South 
        Circleville, OH 43113-9002 
        Ph: 740-477-6652 (x6652) 
        Fx: 740-420-6511 
        Pg: 740-863-0080 (x5306 Internal) 
        Cell: 614-477-6741 
        robertsp@xxxxxxx 





        ___ 
        Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.

        If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or
responsible 
        for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or
deliver 
        this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message

        and kindly notify the sender by reply email. 
        ___ 

        ------------------------------------------------------
        You are currently subscribed to this MSExchange.org Discussion List
as: m.dewell@xxxxxxxxx
        To unsubscribe send a blank email to
$subst('Email.Unsub')

RE: Eseutil

Other related posts: