[etni] Re: food for thought
- From: "Adele Raemer" <raemer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <granny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,"ETNI discussion list" <etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 16:08:57 +0200
**** ETNI on the web http://www.etni.org.il http://www.etni.org ****
Do you really think that the same should be expected from a 4 pointer, as
from a 5 pointer? I have always said the exact OPPOSITE of what you are
saying: there should be a separate scale for 4 pointers' oral tests, just as
the writing rubric is different for 4 and 5 pointers.
Adele
----- Original Message -----
From: "Iris Elish" <granny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "etni" <etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 10:56 AM
Subject: [etni] food for thought
> **** ETNI on the web http://www.etni.org.il http://www.etni.org ****
>
> Shalom All,
>
> I have always wondered why we all divide our 4 and 5 pupils into different
> groups at the oral bagrut examinations. The rubric we use to test our
pupils
> is the same for 4 and 5 so why do we make the division. I think it is
unfair
> as I am sure we all expect more for the 5 pointers and less from the 4
> pointers. We should have mixed groups and the testers should not be told
> whether the pupil is a 5 pointer or 4. This way the pupils will really be
> tested on ability and not from what we expect of them.
>
> What do you all think?
>
> All the best,
> Iris.
>
> ##### To send a message to the ETNI list email: etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
#####
> ##### Send queries and questions to: ask@xxxxxxxx #####
>
##### To send a message to the ETNI list email: etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx #####
##### Send queries and questions to: ask@xxxxxxxx #####
Other related posts:
