---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Nathan Singer <nathansinger1181@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: HOTS Debora, Here's an even better one: Why not have the entire LOG presented AS THE ORAL EXAM instead of doing a separate project??? It makes perfect sense and saves tons of work. Nathan Debora wrote: > This year I am teaching the HOTS literature program -- Log option -- > to a group of 20 English speakers, working parallel to another teacher > who is doing the same with another group of twenty students. As > nothing of the program was touched last year -- we have been obliged > to do everyhing in one year. We have both been struggling to prepare > the students for Module E and Module G as well as study the eight > pieces without becoming advocates of superficialism -- and to a large > extent we have succeeded. > > However, from the experience of this year, I would like to propose a > relatively minor change (major changes would also be beneficial but I > am putting them aside for the moment) to the HOTS program . The minor > change is requiring that the entire LOG be presented at the oral > bagrut exam, and not just the Bridging project. The reason I am > suggesting this, is that the pupils work so hard on their LOGS, they > should have a chance to present it officially and get feedback on > their presentation. In addition, it would add the component that > someone other than their teacher will be looking through their LOG. > Moreover, the students would then have to think through the entire > process of preparing the LOG in order to discuss the process at the > oral bagrut. > > AS I have not yet taught a class doing the literature exam option, I > am not sure how my suggestion would work with that group.