Re: packaging emel for ubuntu
- From: <tpgww@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: emelfm2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:26:13 +1100
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:14:55 +0100
Liviu Andronic <landronimirc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I ended up with the following build-time deps:
> Build-Depends: libglib2.0-dev, libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.6), imagemagick,
> debhelper (>= 7), quilt (>= 0.46-7~), libmagic-dev, libgtkspell-dev
> (>= 2.0.14), udisks, libdbus-glib-1-dev, libacl1-dev
>
> Does anything look strange to you? I'm also hesitating: is 'udisks' a
> build-time requirement, or is it only needed at run-time?
Runtime only.
>
>
> As for the run-time deps, here's the resulting list (when built against
> Lucid):
> Depends: libacl1 (>= 2.2.11-1), libc6 (>= 2.4), libcairo2 (>= 1.2.4),
> libdbus-glib-1-2 (>= 0.78), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.23.5), libgtk2.0-0 (>=
> 2.20.0), libgtkspell0 (>= 2.0.15), libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.18.0),
> libmagic1
> Recommends: libbz2-1.0 | liblzo2-2, grep (>= 2.5.3), sed (>= 4.1.5),
> udisks, policykit-1
> Suggests: tracker-utils
>
> Again, does anything seem queer to you? I'm specifically thinking of
> 'tracker-utils': even though it's not needed at build-time, does emel
> still interact with it at run-time? Should I Suggest or Recommend
> 'tracker-utils' when building with WITH_TRACKER=1?
Yes to both.
>
>
> Last, below are the Makefile.config options that I'm tweaking at build-time:
> MAKEOPTS = \
> WITH_KERNELFAM=1 \
> NEW_COMMAND=1 \
> EDITOR_SPELLCHECK=1 \
> WITH_LATEST=1 \
> WITH_THUMBS=1 WITH_THUMBLIB=0 \
> WITH_TRACKER=1 \
> WITH_ACL=1 \
> WITH_POLKIT=1 \
> WITH_UDISKS=1
>
> Are these sensible default for a modern Linux distro? Specifically,
> Is WITH_KERNELFAM=1 and USE_INOTIFY=1 the preferred file polling method?
Yes
> Is WITH_UDISKS=1 preferred over WITH_HAL=1?
Yes. HAL is deprecated, sooner or later distros will omit it.
Regards
Tom
--
Users can unsubscribe from the list by sending email to
emelfm2-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field or by
logging into the web interface.
Other related posts:
