On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:26:16 +0100 Liviu Andronic <landronimirc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello > I'm currently working on packaging emel for Ubuntu and sofar it works > fine [1] but I'd like to get all the dependencies and build options in > order. > > I'm using the following deps at build time: > Build-Depends: libglib2.0-dev, libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.6), debhelper (>= > 7), quilt (>= 0.46-7~), imagemagick, libmagic-dev, libgtkspell-dev > (>=2.0.14), udisks | devicekit-disks (>= 009), libdbus-glib-1-dev, > libacl1-dev, libpolkit-gobject-1-dev > > Are any optional deps missing? Are there any deps that shouldn't be > there (I'm specifically thinking of imagemagick, udisks | > devicekit-disks (>= 009)? Is libpolkit-gobject-1-dev [2] the > appropriate package for POLKIT=1? I've inspected closely the home > page, the INSTALL file and the Makefile.config, but I'd like to make > sure that I'm not overthinking anything. no 'internal' use of imagemagick, maybe for icon resizing? udisks for WITH_UDISKS=1 WITH_DEVKIT is deprecated libdbus-glib-1-dev is needed only for glib < 2.26 libacl1-dev is needed only for WITH_ACL=1 libgtkspell-dev is needed only for EDITOR_SPELLCHECK=1 > > As for run-time deps, in addition to the above, I also have: > Recommends: libmagic1, libbz2-1.0 | liblzo2-2 | , file (>= 4), grep > (>= 2.5.3), sed (>= 4.1.5), xdg-utils, udisks | devicekit-disks (>= > 009) file command not used now (libmagic instead) can't think of any use for xdg-utils > > Should any of the above be part of 'Depends' (instaed of > 'Recommends')? Moreover, I have the following package suggested: > Suggests: tracker-utils > > Is this OK? Are 'tracker-utils' (or anything else related) needed at > build time? No. Several commands used at runtime when WITH_TRACKER=1 > > Please let me know if I'm getting the deps right. Thanks > Liviu -- Users can unsubscribe from the list by sending email to emelfm2-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field or by logging into the web interface.