In the interview with Clifford Stoll, a discussion was presented regarding the importance of computers in schools. Stoll pointed out that schools spend an excessive amount of money in order to ensure up-to-date technology, and he discussed the usefulness of this technology. Stoll acknowledged that students need basic computer skills, but he feels that these skills do not require years of practice or the best equipment to obtain. Stoll also mentions that computers often take space that could be used for other subject areas, like art or music. I have to agree with Stoll to a degree. It does seem somewhat frivolous to continue to spend so much money so that kids can learn to use a word processor. I strongly believe that all students need practice with computers, but I think that skills can be learned in short periods of time. Computers seem to be put at a level of importance that is not necessarily sound. Computers should be used as a tool, but I think a lot of the technological inovations can be done with out. I think Stoll does a nice job of pointing out that computers are useful, but not necessarily essential. Schools seem to be under the impression that computers are indespensible, and I do not think that this is necessarily so. I benefited from reading the article because it gave me the opportunity to step back from all the computer hype and look at the need for computers in a realistic sense. We can provide good education with out the use of fancy mimio boards and power point presentations. Although these advances can contribute to good teaching, they should not come at greater cost than they are really worth. ------------------------------------------------------------ Class website: http://www.greece.k12.ny.us/taylor/suny/ ------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from this listserv, go to: http://www.greece.k12.ny.us/taylor/suny/listserv.htm If you have any problems, send an e-mail to: JerryTaylr@xxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------------