I can only tell you that around here, people prefer Megadots--that is blind people, but Megadots is a DOS program. I'm updating my Duxbury, finally, to Windows, and everyone--about a dozen people so far--is warning me about its pitfalls. On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Catherine Thomas wrote: > Blind and sighted transcribers do things differently because they have to. > In addition most blind transcribers are familiar with braille. This is > very different from someone who doesn't know much about braille and is > only trying to produce a readable document. Why can't there be a couple of > different user manuals tailored to different sets of needs? > Catherine > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > -Catherine Thomas > braille@xxxxxxxxx / > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > * * * > * This message is via list duxuser at freelists.org. > * To unsubscribe, send a blank message with > * unsubscribe > * as the subject to <duxuser-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. You may also > * subscribe, unsubscribe, and set vacation mode and other subscription > * options by visiting //www.freelists.org. The list archive > * is also located there. > * Duxbury Systems' web site is http://www.duxburysystems.com > * * * > * * * * This message is via list duxuser at freelists.org. * To unsubscribe, send a blank message with * unsubscribe * as the subject to <duxuser-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. You may also * subscribe, unsubscribe, and set vacation mode and other subscription * options by visiting //www.freelists.org. The list archive * is also located there. * Duxbury Systems' web site is http://www.duxburysystems.com * * *