At 13:21 +0200 UTC, on 2006-10-05, Oliver Betz wrote: [...] > ''Emphasize'' and '''strongly''' is not that intuitive as **bold** > and //italic//, but bold/italic isn't the right wording, anyway, is > it? Ah! I hadn't noticed yet that Dokuwiki translates bold to <strong> and italic and underline to <em>. But what's the rationale behind calling this bold, italic and underline in the UI, even in the documentation? FWIW, I think a nicer approach would be to name it for what it is: "emphasis" (or "emphasize"). An appropriate icon for the toolbar might be that of an exclamation mark. (And IMO you only need to provide 1 single emphasis function, because <strong> isn't that useful anyway. When it's really needed, you can nest <em>.) After all, it's the CSS that decides on the presentation. Users get confused if using the italics buton results in text being presented bold and red. Also, my Dokuwiki users tend to abuse bold and italic for things that really are headings. I strongly suspect that wouldn't happen if the UI would be more true about what this really is about: emphasis. -- Sander Tekelenburg, <http://www.euronet.nl/~tekelenb/> -- DokuWiki mailing list - more info at http://wiki.splitbrain.org/wiki:mailinglist