On 12/2/14, doug <douglasrankine2001@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ... for every person who uses it, the mix is always different. > However, like all of those concepts and principles, there are always the > exceptions, and by careful study, one can discern patterns and themes in > the person who expresses it and in what they are saying, and, even allow > one to decrypt, or analyse at least some of it. Decoding the language > in a wordsoup, not only depends on the content and how it is arranged, > but "cribs" are needed about the person, their background, age, work > skills, education, habits, learning, where they are from and so on, so > that one can build a picture about them. this reads perfectly as a guide to understanding industry and trade jargon :) > In this very sad case, it > appears that all the person wants is for some property right to be > sorted out and her property returned to her and the property which > doesn't belong to her, to be returned to those who are authorised to > hold it. _all_ that is wanted? i observed a strong desire for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as well! ( are these so much to ask before the Court? ;) > I don't know anything about this case, ... at hundreds of pages, you must be masochist to study it, no doubt, > ... > The NSA, of course, has no > interest in making sense out of the nonsensical...it only works on pure > intelligence...:-). touche`, and carry on! it seems the push toward mental instability, or even the appearance of it, serves their purposes well enough. how many whistle-blowers mentally ill? correlation not causation, of course, but "Hmmm" none the less. *grin* best regards,