[CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
- From: Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:07:57 -0800
when I get my shit together i will dive into this thing a bit.
I still want to fuck around with that shounen jump fighting shit.
...... and maybe finally play crisis core.
On 14 November 2013 09:49, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yeah it's pretty cool. You can even use a FightStick.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Stephen Scheidel
> <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> Has anyone tried this ?
>> http://www.ppsspp.org/
>>
>> Would be nice to know if T6 runs frame perfect.
>>
>>
>> On 14 November 2013 09:02, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>
>>> That is petty fucked up.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 14 November 2013 06:26, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> UltraDavid on the leaked secret copyright treaties:
>>>>
>>>> --Some countries want more protection for geographical indications,
>>>> which are rights to names based on location (like how sparkling wine is
>>>> only "champagne" if it's from Champagne France). The US seems not to really
>>>> care about this.
>>>>
>>>> --It provides for a big increase in the kinds of things that can be
>>>> patented in ways that could harm the pace of innovation, consumers, and
>>>> smaller companies. Newly patentable things would include plants, animals,
>>>> biological processes, video game rules, *methods of mental processes*,
>>>> software itself, artwork, books, and more. The US already allows some of
>>>> these, but other countries don't, and nobody allows patents for some of
>>>> them.
>>>>
>>>> --There's a way to re-patent already known or previously patented stuff
>>>> as long as you claim the stuff has a new use. The US also wants standards
>>>> for granting patents to be relaxed a bit compared to many countries'
>>>> current requirements and patent terms to be made effectively longer by not
>>>> counting long delays between when the patent was first filed and when it
>>>> was granted (which can take years in some cases) toward the total patent
>>>> term.
>>>>
>>>> --There are some reasons for a country to not allow a patent to be used
>>>> (aka exploited), like dire health circumstances, but not, as it says,
>>>> "merely because the exploitation is prohibited by their law."
>>>>
>>>> --Penalties for many kinds of copyright infringement and circumvention
>>>> of technological protections like DRM would be increased. Some of these
>>>> rules would require countries to install penalties like the US currently
>>>> has, while others criminalize and penalize more severely than anyone
>>>> currently does.
>>>>
>>>> --If the US gets its way, internet service providers will be on the
>>>> hook to some degree for copyright infringement engaged in by their users
>>>> and will be legally incented to work with copyright owners to deter
>>>> infringement. Other countries oppose this.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/1qj6xd/wikileaks_releases_the_secret_negotiated_draft/cddnaqb
>>>>
>>>> The bolded part is a big WTF (I looked it up - it's legit). Basically
>>>> someone can patent certain methods of teaching and instruction. Imagine
>>>> not being able to do long division because your school couldn't afford the
>>>> royalty fees associated with teaching you how to do it.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
