f u I agree with this 99% because I don't like u Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:26:28 +0200 Subject: Re: CTS community mail From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Jeeva and CTS had a symbiotic relationship for a long time. He advertised his venue as the GamerNET house. After a while, it seemed as if we were the only ones gaming there. There were times when he used CTS as a way of advertising GamerNET. I don't think anyone had and issue with that. But as was mentioned many times before, if he's not interested in running a Gaming venue any longer, he should just let us know. My R200 (fuck y'all broke ass niggas :p) On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:55 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: yes I agree with manase 100% Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 14:32:03 +0200 Subject: Re: CTS community mail From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx I feel we should not burn bridges with Jeeva. We can use both venues like Nick is suggesting. Jeeva is convenient for me for obvious reasons, it's closer, his mom adores us and Internet is free whenever we are able to use it. Kamimodo can be used as a tournament venue or whenever guys feel like having a slight change of scenery. That's my 2 cents. On 17 Nov 2014 12:33, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: I dunno what to say about Jeeva. I know this. He wants us there. He won't want us to leave. He lacks communication. Here's what I have to say. I like Kamimodo, but Jeeva's is nearer. Jeeva is lighter on the pocket, but we have to deal with bs. Kamimodo is more expensive, but the exposure is awesome. In my opinion, the best way to deal with this diplomatically, would be to ask Jeeva if there will be any meetings and shit in the week, and then relocate for that weekend. If there's no-one at Jeevas, have a session there instead. That way, we can keep the communication on the level, and let both parties know how we operate. Whoever needs us the most, will make the most effort. Thoughts?