We'd have to confirm. I'll chat to Zaid about it. On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair < alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Since the only thing that affects me is Evo weekend, how does the Kami > place look for extended stays – more than 24hrs? > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Ashraf Barendse > *Sent:* 17 November 2014 10:45 AM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > *Subject:* Re: CTS community mail > > > > I'm also leaning towards Kamimodo. In addition to the reasons you posted, > I really used to enjoy session at Geco while it lasted, and we could get a > similar vibe at Kamimodo. > > Hopefully we can get a decent rate, since like you said, we'll be using > our own equipment. > > > > All we really need is the space, internet usage, and maybe one of their > PCs would be nice. > > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Hi all > > > > Some of you already know my feelings on this matter, so I'm just sharing > this with those who don't. > > > > In light of recent 'developments' at the GamerNET house, I think it's time > for us to consider relocating. > > > > We've had a good run there, but things are changing - and not necessarily > for the better, in my opinion. > > > > I don't mind change. If it is good, or beneficial in some way, I'm all for > it. Right now, it seems like these changes are benefiting an individual and > not a collective. > > > > So let me get right to the 'meat and potatoes' of what this is all about. > We get there on Saturday and start setting up. There's a car parked outside > at Jeeva's house that most of the regulars have already come to associate > with 'quiet time'. Now, this 'quiet time' I'm referring to is when IT > training has been scheduled at Jeeva's house. During the training period, > we are promptly told to shut the fuck up until such time as training has > been concluded. > > > > I understand that Jeeva's house is a registered training institution. I > understand that he has to make ends meet and that this is just another > source of income. What I don't like is that other people who pay to be > there get the shaft because of how he feels he should conduct business. > This is gripe number one. > > > > Gripe number two was when I wanted to set up the Challonge brackets for > the standard Sat tourney, only to realise that the internet connection > wasn't working (ethernet link to Jeeva's network). Not only that, but the > wireless details had also changed. Again, not typically something that one > would feel the need to complain about, provided that shit gets properly > communicated. > > > > Which brings me to gripe number three; a distinct lack of communication > these days. Jeeva's just making changes without informing anyone. Maybe > we're just not 'important' enough to inform. Or perhaps, changes like these > don't warrant explanation, as far as he's concerned. It's fine for him to > send me an sms on any given Saturday to inform me that 'the guys are making > too much noise, can they please keep it down between 12pm and 1pm', but he > can't even communicate something as simple as 'hi guys, I had to change the > internet/network settings to accommodate the students/training personnel, > so if you want to use the internet, please use these new credentials'. Shit > like this pisses me off. > > > > I'm starting to feel like we've overstayed our welcome and that Jeeva is > trying, in a very subtle, manner, to get us to leave. It's an assumption on > my part, I'll admit - but if someone isn't setting the record straight and > actually communicating this shit, then assumptions are all I have. > > > > So here's what I'm looking to do. I'll be chatting to Zaid this week about > sessioning at Kamimodo and ask him if it would be possible for us to > perhaps get a discount on the monthly rate, seeing as how we'd be bringing > our own consoles and screens. > > > > What I would like is to hear from everyone before we commit to anything. > I'd like to hear your thoughts on the matter. How do you feel about the way > things are at the GamerNET house currently? Do you feel there's some merit > to what I'm saying? Would you prefer that we try to make the most of a > slightly unpleasant situation or consider alternatives? Please feel free to > voice your opinions. > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > So where did you find the info? > ------------------------------ > > From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: CTS community mail > Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 07:33:26 +0000 > > > > oh I see its not in the video. > > Well the mkg set is being nerfed, where clones only spawn when using > tempest rush and the dmg is reduced to 500%. > > ------------------------------ > > From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: CTS community mail > Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 07:16:25 +0000 > > What sunwuko nerf? Mentioned where? > > > > Rest of the news is almost 2 weeks old... > ------------------------------ > > From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: CTS community mail > Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 20:28:23 +0000 > > > so sunwuko's getting a nerf tsek, > > RAIMENT IS IN WOOOOOOOP, tsek paas. > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgrVA0PWl5o&list=UURl31PWkfF0a3j3hiDRaCGA > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 20:54:55 +0200 > Subject: RE: CTS community mail > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Nice :) > > On 16 Nov 2014 20:50, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Something you arcade heads may find interesting/cool > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiRPH6uDF9U > > > > ________________________________ > > Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 17:52:14 +0200 > > > > Subject: Re: CTS community mail > > From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Confirmed by CEO: > > > https://www.facebook.com/Quizup/posts/640523729343276?comment_id=6071726&offset=0&total_comments=34 > > > > On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> > >> So after playing QuizUp for about 30 minutes I've come to the > conclusion that most of the "players" are actually bots that just choose > random answers. The app will match you up with a bot if no human players > are available. > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. >