Re: CTS community mail
- From: Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 14:32:19 +0200
That's true, it has a sense of "own".
:/
Perhaps Sap isn't overthinking it. Lol.
On 17 Nov 2014 14:13, "sameegh jardine" <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> My 2c.
>
> I think a change of scenery is always refreshing. Jeeva's is awesome for
> sustaining out existing routine which is pretty comfortable but doesn't
> provide great exposure or visibility. I'm comfortable with either as a
> session venue though.
>
> I do think whatever venue we choose, it'd be better if there was a default
> option. Based on what we've seen in the past, we know that many of us don't
> do well with coordination. What's nice about the current setup is that
> anyone can simply rock up on a Saturday and not have to ask where the
> session is going to be, unless there's a tournament somewhere (once in a
> blue moon).
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> OK, cool.
>> I understand where you're coming from.
>> On 17 Nov 2014 13:48, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> That's all fine and good. I've already mentioned that I have no issues
>>> with him building up the college and prioritising that. But I'm still
>>> paying to use the venue. If I was there for free, I wouldn't say anything.
>>>
>>> You don't have to be a 'good communicator' to communicate. It's got
>>> nothing to do with being eloquent or being professional; it has everything
>>> to do with being open and honest. Things are happening there that is not
>>> being communicated. Jeeva CAN communicate the changes but CHOOSES not to. I
>>> refer to 'selective' communication yet again. If it suits him, he'll inform
>>> you about it. If you don't need to know, you won't hear from him. If you
>>> don't agree, I accept that, but I'm just going according to what I
>>> experienced this past Saturday, and I wasn't the only one.
>>>
>>> I'm not saying I'm ungrateful for what he's done and for allowing us to
>>> use his venue and facilities, and I agree that we are fortunate to have
>>> what we have, but I'm not the biggest fan of being left in the dark about
>>> everything that is happening there now.
>>>
>>> So look. We can continue to do what we do there and put up with having
>>> to 'keep quiet' when it suits Jeeva and wait for the next change to happen
>>> that might not even be communicated, as long as it's what everyone wants
>>> collectively. I just want people to be able to enjoy themselves and make
>>> the most of the day. If that's not happening, damn straight I'm going to
>>> look elsewhere.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> You're overthinking this.
>>>> Take it easy before you stroke out.
>>>>
>>>> Jeeva has been busy building up the college, his prioroties lie there.
>>>> That makes us no2, Jeeves isn't the best at communicating or
>>>> multitasking. At least, that's what I'm assuming/speculating.
>>>>
>>>> I've never seen myself as a paying customer and therefore never expect
>>>> service delivery.
>>>> For me it has always been more along the lines of, we get to use the
>>>> venue, here's a little something for your trouble.
>>>>
>>>> I think we are really fortunate to have what we have already.
>>>> I'm mostly thankful for just that.
>>>> On 17 Nov 2014 13:11, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If Jeeva honestly feels that we've overstayed our welcome, it wouldn't
>>>>> offend me if he just said so *lol* Just be honest and say "Listen guys,
>>>>> unfortunately I won't be able to accommodate you anymore because I'm
>>>>> looking to take things in a different direction". I wouldn't have a
>>>>> problem
>>>>> with that because you were up front with me about what's happening.
>>>>> Leaving
>>>>> things open to interpretation, on the other hand, is a very dangerous
>>>>> thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Sean Carrington <
>>>>> theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm all for Kamimodo as well (not just cuz of it's proximity lol).
>>>>>> Like Ashraf said it has that Gecco vibe to it that was really cool
>>>>>> back in the days, and it's a more gaming friendly place IMO.
>>>>>> Not to mention there's a bigger probability to attrack more gamers
>>>>>> there... well i think.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wouldn't know about how Jeeva feels but should it really be the
>>>>>> case that we've overstayed our welcome, it's only natural.
>>>>>> We've been there for quite a long time so it wouldn't be a surprise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm down with Kamimodo if the rates are fair enough for everyon :)
>>>>>> #MovingON
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:42 PM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I like this idea the most.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you nick.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:32:47 +0200
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
>>>>>>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I dunno what to say about Jeeva.
>>>>>>> I know this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He wants us there. He won't want us to leave. He lacks
>>>>>>> communication.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's what I have to say.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I like Kamimodo, but Jeeva's is nearer.
>>>>>>> Jeeva is lighter on the pocket, but we have to deal with bs.
>>>>>>> Kamimodo is more expensive, but the exposure is awesome.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In my opinion, the best way to deal with this diplomatically, would
>>>>>>> be to ask Jeeva if there will be any meetings and shit in the week, and
>>>>>>> then relocate for that weekend.
>>>>>>> If there's no-one at Jeevas, have a session there instead.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That way, we can keep the communication on the level, and let both
>>>>>>> parties know how we operate.
>>>>>>> Whoever needs us the most, will make the most effort.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
Other related posts:
