RE: CTS community mail
- From: "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:02:05 +0000
Well, there is a meteorological station there. Not sure how good their net
access is. At least we can make a lot of noise and I doubt we’ll bother the
neighbours.
It’s on for Evo next year.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Stephen Scheidel
Sent: 17 November 2014 1:58 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: CTS community mail
Sessions at Marion island ya'll
I'll bring chips.
On 17 November 2014 13:56, Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Lion’s Head was an active volcano a few million years ago. Not anymore.
Marion Island is probably our closest active volcano.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On
Behalf Of Stephen Scheidel
Sent: 17 November 2014 1:52 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: CTS community mail
Are there any volcanoes near by ?
On 17 November 2014 13:48, Ryan Williams
<ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
That's all fine and good. I've already mentioned that I have no issues with him
building up the college and prioritising that. But I'm still paying to use the
venue. If I was there for free, I wouldn't say anything.
You don't have to be a 'good communicator' to communicate. It's got nothing to
do with being eloquent or being professional; it has everything to do with
being open and honest. Things are happening there that is not being
communicated. Jeeva CAN communicate the changes but CHOOSES not to. I refer to
'selective' communication yet again. If it suits him, he'll inform you about
it. If you don't need to know, you won't hear from him. If you don't agree, I
accept that, but I'm just going according to what I experienced this past
Saturday, and I wasn't the only one.
I'm not saying I'm ungrateful for what he's done and for allowing us to use his
venue and facilities, and I agree that we are fortunate to have what we have,
but I'm not the biggest fan of being left in the dark about everything that is
happening there now.
So look. We can continue to do what we do there and put up with having to 'keep
quiet' when it suits Jeeva and wait for the next change to happen that might
not even be communicated, as long as it's what everyone wants collectively. I
just want people to be able to enjoy themselves and make the most of the day.
If that's not happening, damn straight I'm going to look elsewhere.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
You're overthinking this.
Take it easy before you stroke out.
Jeeva has been busy building up the college, his prioroties lie there.
That makes us no2, Jeeves isn't the best at communicating or multitasking. At
least, that's what I'm assuming/speculating.
I've never seen myself as a paying customer and therefore never expect service
delivery.
For me it has always been more along the lines of, we get to use the venue,
here's a little something for your trouble.
I think we are really fortunate to have what we have already.
I'm mostly thankful for just that.
On 17 Nov 2014 13:11, "Ryan Williams"
<ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
If Jeeva honestly feels that we've overstayed our welcome, it wouldn't offend
me if he just said so *lol* Just be honest and say "Listen guys, unfortunately
I won't be able to accommodate you anymore because I'm looking to take things
in a different direction". I wouldn't have a problem with that because you were
up front with me about what's happening. Leaving things open to interpretation,
on the other hand, is a very dangerous thing.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Sean Carrington
<theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I'm all for Kamimodo as well (not just cuz of it's proximity lol).
Like Ashraf said it has that Gecco vibe to it that was really cool back in the
days, and it's a more gaming friendly place IMO.
Not to mention there's a bigger probability to attrack more gamers there...
well i think.
I wouldn't know about how Jeeva feels but should it really be the case that
we've overstayed our welcome, it's only natural.
We've been there for quite a long time so it wouldn't be a surprise.
I'm down with Kamimodo if the rates are fair enough for everyon :) #MovingON
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:42 PM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I like this idea the most.
Thank you nick.
________________________________
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:32:47 +0200
Subject: Re: CTS community mail
From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I dunno what to say about Jeeva.
I know this.
He wants us there. He won't want us to leave. He lacks communication.
Here's what I have to say.
I like Kamimodo, but Jeeva's is nearer.
Jeeva is lighter on the pocket, but we have to deal with bs.
Kamimodo is more expensive, but the exposure is awesome.
In my opinion, the best way to deal with this diplomatically, would be to ask
Jeeva if there will be any meetings and shit in the week, and then relocate for
that weekend.
If there's no-one at Jeevas, have a session there instead.
That way, we can keep the communication on the level, and let both parties know
how we operate.
Whoever needs us the most, will make the most effort.
Thoughts?
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
**********************************************************************
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
Other related posts:
