Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
- From: G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:16:13 +0200
Ah, geez, thats a great guy to have around.
Hmph... gotta try some places tomorrow then.
On 13 Jan 2014 14:10, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've eaten at most of those places. My friend is one of those foodie nuts
> who eats everywhere and puts pics of his PB and Jam on instagram. He's a
> good cook though.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 2:08 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Oh wow, there are some cool places in Town, eh?
>>
>> Where'd you read about all this?
>> On 13 Jan 2014 14:07, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> In that case I'd recommend Baia. Oh I forgot the most obvious place,
>>> Pigalle. It's like 2 blocks from me but I haven't been there yet. People
>>> rave about it though. I think it's the highest rated seafood restaurant on
>>> Trip Advisor for the Cape Town region.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Stephen Scheidel <
>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks man.
>>>> Carne was quite pricey but very worth it.
>>>>
>>>> We're only gonna do one place a month so there is not much chance of
>>>> having to file bankruptcy from the odd pricey meal.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 13 January 2014 13:48, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Haven't had good seafood in ages. Mostly because of my seafood
>>>>> allergy. In my experience the biggest problem, especially with seafood
>>>>> restaurants, is consistency.
>>>>>
>>>>> Roca at Cape Quarter has buffet 5 or 6 times a week which is actually
>>>>> pretty good. They do a bit of everything, including fish, prawn and
>>>>> mussel
>>>>> dishes. Sunday afternoon I think is the seafood buffet. Problem is that
>>>>> if the owner isn't there to oversee things in the kitchen, the food is
>>>>> pretty crappy. Also, if they have lots of left overs from Saturday I'm
>>>>> pretty sure they use it on their Sunday menu, but don't quote me on that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Codfather in Camps Bay is overrated and overpriced, but they do have
>>>>> nice things occasionally. I had really good angel fish the last time I
>>>>> was
>>>>> there. In my experience, the other restaurants in Camps Bay are terrible.
>>>>> Blues may be the exception, but it's nothing special I don't think.
>>>>>
>>>>> Willoughby's does a popular fish and chips meal, but you probably know
>>>>> this already.
>>>>>
>>>>> Baia at the Waterfront was actually really good the last time I was
>>>>> there, but it was quite pricey
>>>>>
>>>>> I've heard from two people recently that I should check out Bentley's
>>>>> Oyster Bar in Claremont but I've never been there so I can't comment
>>>>>
>>>>> My favourite seafood platter used to be at Cubana Greenpoint, but I
>>>>> haven't had it in over a year. I don't know what linefish they use these
>>>>> days
>>>>>
>>>>> In terms of Asian places, Thai Cafe in Sea Point (best Thai restaurant
>>>>> but avoid anything with coconut - way too rich).
>>>>>
>>>>> Mr Chan used to do the best Sichuan prawn/kingklip, deep fried fish,
>>>>> prawn omelette, fish stomach soup (off the menu), prawn on toast, clams,
>>>>> chillied calamari and seafood fried rice. When Mrs Chan was their she
>>>>> once
>>>>> made the most tender grilled calamari I'd ever had. I really need to go
>>>>> back there just to test the food again...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Stephen Scheidel <
>>>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey Salie ~ or anyone.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Me and some of my non-FG friends are trying to do a bit of a GOOD
>>>>>> restaurant round trip.
>>>>>> We were at Carne SA on Friday for steaks and that was phenomenal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Next on the list is seafood ~ Any suggestions for a good seafood
>>>>>> place aroundish CT ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 13 January 2014 12:06, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope, going to visit my folks tonight
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:05:13 +0000
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks. You’re not around tonight, right?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben
>>>>>>> *Sent:* 13 January 2014 11:58 AM
>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wont mind joining in if you need another DPS that already knows
>>>>>>> the fight
>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:56:41 +0000
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> DPS.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My healer still needs a few levels. Also, my smn is actually pretty
>>>>>>> well geared. It will take a bit of time for my healer to get there.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cool, thanks. I’ll let you know during the week how things are going
>>>>>>> and if (more likely, when) I’ll need your help.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>>>>>> Behalf Of *euraima tobias
>>>>>>> *Sent:* 13 January 2014 11:54 AM
>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sure man. Which class you going as, dps or healer?
>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
>>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
>>>>>>> send to
>>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
>>>>>>> it,
>>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
>>>>>>> governing
>>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
>>>>>>> information
>>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended,
>>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
>>>>>>> ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
>>>>>>> services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International")
>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>> Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>>>>>>> independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
>>>>>>> provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as
>>>>>>> such.
>>>>>>> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG
>>>>>>> member
>>>>>>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
>>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
>>>>>>> send to
>>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
>>>>>>> it,
>>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
>>>>>>> governing
>>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
>>>>>>> information
>>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended,
>>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
>>>>>>> ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
>>>>>>> services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International")
>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>> Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>>>>>>> independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
>>>>>>> provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as
>>>>>>> such.
>>>>>>> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG
>>>>>>> member
>>>>>>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
Other related posts:
