[codeface] Re: shiny server
- From: Wolfgang Mauerer <wm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: codeface@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 20:19:15 +0100
Am 06/03/2015 um 15:39 schrieb florian.peguet@xxxxxx:
> Dear all,
>
> I managed to solve my previous problem ( the command xsltproc was not
> installed and seems to be mandatory for cppstats, maybe it could be a
> good thing to add apt-get install xsltproc, in the README process)
yes, this requirement is indeed documented on cppstat's homepage:
http://www.infosun.fim.uni-passau.de/cl/staff/liebig/cppstats/
Good catch - could you please submit a patch for the README file?
>
> "Codeface test" now give the same result wether I execute it from the
> regensburg server or the docker images.
> The enhancements of analyses for project may be pass on the docker
> instance since I use git clone.
>
> I am now thinking about using shiny server so that users can use
> codeface easily from their web browser, but I got errors.
>
> When I run shiny server (with the command shiny-server
> shiny-server.config) from my computer (same as the regensburg-server) I
> got this at localhost with firefox :
> ERROR: impossible to find the function "breadcrumbOutput".
> Have I missed something?
the function should be defined in codeface/R/shiny/nav/breadcrumb.shiny.r,
maybe there a file inclusion missing somewhere. Can you look at the log
files (there are several of them, look for *.log in the installation
directory) and post the complete error message?
>
> for docker, it is harder to run shiny-server, because localhost is
> running on the virtual container and not on the real computer/server.
> The solution is to create a bridge between ports.
> I tried to make a bridge for port 8081 where the shiny server may run
> but i got Page not found on my web browser. This means something
> happened otherwise I would get "connection failed"
the approach is sound; naturally, docker cannot use the host
ports directly because otherwise you would not be able to run,
for instance, two containers with different versions of a server
software on one single machine.
>
> for now I don't understand why I don't get the previous error with
> docker (breadcrumbOutput not found) .
> Is there more than one port to bind?
did you properly expose the port in the dockerfile? Can you sniff
the traffic with, say, wireshark to see what it going on on the wire?
Best regards, Wolfgang Mauerer
>
> I use docker like that:
> docker run -p port_on_docker:port_on_the_real_computer
> folder_name/my_image_name:tag
>
> Florian.
>
Other related posts:
