Right. We will probably need package-info.java in each package anyway. I think you can go ahead. John B. On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 07:34:24PM +0100, Michael Whapples wrote: > Well it gets my vote. > > The only thing I will warn of, mercurial is unable to store an empty > directory, therefore I will need to put suitable holder files in > relevant directories (eg. either a Java class or may be > package-info.java for the package level javadoc in java packages, etc). > This isn't a problem just something everyone should be aware of. > > Michael Whapples > On 30/07/10 16:27, John Gardner wrote: > >Sounds to me as if there is broad agreement, so I vote yes. > >John G > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >[mailto:brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John J. Boyer > >Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 4:31 AM > >To: brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >Subject: [brailleblaster] Are we agreed to use maven? > > > >If so, I think we should give Michael Whapples the go-ahead to set up > >the maven repository and also to set up empty directories in the > >BraileBlaster repository that Maven expects. > > > >John B. > > > > > -- John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer Abilitiessoft, Inc. http://www.abilitiessoft.com Madison, Wisconsin USA Developing software for people with disabilities