[bookshare-discuss] Re: OT Re: about the optacan

  • From: "Evan Reese" <mentat1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 09:31:35 -0800

You weren't REALLY expecting the price to come down, were you?  <grin> How 
often have you seen something for the visually impaired start out at a high 
price and cost less later?  I'll bet you'll have a hard time coming up with 
more than a rare instance.  Pardon my cynicism, but I haven't seen it happen 
very often.

When I was living in Pennsylvania, in high school, many students at the blind 
school I was at got them by way of a grant from the Mellon foundation, reducing 
the cost to the buyer of $100 - or in this case, the buyer's family.  I don't 
know if it's worth $3000, but I'm sure glad to have one.  (Actually, if I 
remember correctly, the price was $3500.)


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Linda Lupaczyk 
  To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 8:33 AM
  Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: about the optacan


  Hello Bookshare family,

  Speaking of the optacon, I have often wished I had one!  I used to be a rehab 
teacher and used an optacon and taught others how to use it.  The price was 
prohibitive, however, so I never did invest in one.  I always thought they 
would come down on the price so those of us working-class people could afford 
it, but they never did.  I couldn't justify spending $3,000 on a machine that 
was so tedious to use, but I would love to have one for the many times reading 
machines can't read something.  For instance, when the print changes on a page, 
the scanners go nuts!  With an optacon, one had a chance of reading the 
material.  I'll never forget how surprised I was when I "saw" italicized print! 
 

  I have also wanted to get a book to learn Spanish.  I can't use the READING 
EDGE for that, because if I insert the card they make for reading Spanish, it 
won't read the English explanations, and if I use my original card which is, of 
course an English-reading card, it won't read the Spanish.  This also could 
have been possible with an optacon, but is it worth $3,000?

  Just some thoughts.

  Linda
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: shannon 
    To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 8:26 AM
    Subject: [bookshare-discuss] about the optacan


    Evan,
    Thank you for the answer. That does sound like a really great thing. It is 
too bad that they don't make it anymore.  What did they come up with to take 
it's place. I would think a toy like that would be in great demand? It sounds 
kind of like a CCTV only instead of a TV, it has a brail display. Do I have 
that right?

    Shannon
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Evan Reese 
      To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 8:02 PM
      Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Just Downloaded My First Book for 
Validation


      Optacon is a - I forget the word for it - a condensed word meaning 
optical to tactile converter.  It uses a camera you move over the page with one 
hand and the print is converted into an image of vibrating pins which you read 
with the index finger of the other hand.  Very useful not only for reading 
print but also looking at raised-line drawings and graphs.

      Most people - including myself - can't read very fast with it, but it's 
great for short stuff and I use it especially for math, which doesn't scan 
well.  I also use it to check scanning errors that aren't obvious from the 
context on stuff I scan, and now on stuff I will validate.

      Unfortunately, the Optacon is no longer manufactured.

        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: shannon 
        To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
        Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 1:03 PM
        Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Just Downloaded My First Book for 
Validation


        Hello Evan,
        I have a kind of unrelated question I am on a couple of lists and 
recently I have heard Optacon allot. What is an Optacon?
        Thanks
        Shannon
          ----- Original Message ----- 
          From: Evan Reese 
          To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
          Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 1:04 PM
          Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Just Downloaded My First Book for 
Validation


          I just downloaded my first book for validation.  It's _In The Ruins_ 
by Kate Elliott, Crown of Stars Volume 6.  It was submitted on November 17, so 
it's been up there for a while.  The submitter put it in the Fair category, and 
by the looks of things, that's about right.  I've noticed quite a few errors 
just in the first few pages.  Also, the copyright information was not provided, 
so I put that in.

          I'm picking up a paper copy this afternoon from a local bookstore.  
If it had been categorized as excellent, I might not have bothered, but I might 
have gotten one anyway - preferably from my local library - but they didn't 
have one.  I would prefer to have a paper copy in case there's a scanning error 
that I can't figure out.  I have an Optacon, so I at least don't have to ask 
someone sighted what's on the page if I run into trouble.  I've been wanting to 
read this book since it came out last August, though, so I'm going to read 
right through it.

          However, if the errors are too many and too egregious, I just may 
scan the whole thing in again.  It might come out better - my OpenBook does a 
pretty good job, especially with hardcovers and trade paperbacks.  It might be 
more effective timewise than trying to puzzle out garbled text.  Hopefully that 
won't be necessary.

          I'm a little nervous, this being my first book and all.  I hope I do 
things correctly.

          By the way, is there a keyboard shortcut for the Copyright symbol?  I 
just used alt-169 at the beginning of the book where it's supposed to be, but I 
was wondering if there is a keyboard combination for that?  Just curious.

          I also subscribed to the volunteer discussion list.  I was a little 
intimidated at first by the 50 messages per day figure cited on the website, 
but I figure that it may not be as bad as all that; it isn't as though I have 
to read all of them.

Other related posts: