Ok, Would I be able to go to hte local APH here in Mass I think thats the org in a building that I have been in and have them replace it, if so I would not have a problem doing so? Pam? I may of spelt your name wrong. It would mean that I could get back to using it right away where mailing which I don't like doing for any thing takes toooooo long of a time. And if I had the money I would just ship it. Any how like I said I am not puting in no way or form APH down as I think they are a great company that does look out for the best of its custormers. Christopher On 9/30/05, Chris Hill <hillco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Stuff happens. I'd mail it back and let them try again. If I gave up > on every device I've used that had a problem, I'd be back with a slate > and stylus. > > > On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 22:20:02 -0400, you wrote: > > >Like I said the device is a great one but it appears to be unstable > >when it comes to the mp3 decoder, which after only having it for 5 > >days when on me. IT only plays white noise now. Then I read all the > >time on here about the problems that are happening. When the device > >WAS working I was using it allllll the time (5 days that is) the > >voice other wise is the a good voice as I have a very had time > >understanding it but when using mp3s books / audio or even smell > >amounts of text it is a great device for me. But I don't have the > >time or energe to have to send it back to APH which I was suppose to > >do in very late Augest but I have not as I HATE going to the post > >office / shoping and I should not have to for the aspect of hardware > >being defected (mp3 decoder) if it was not hardware then they would be > >able to send a program / flash rom to just fix the issue with out > >having to go through the whole prossess of sending it back. > > > >Any how like I said it is a great device but if I can not count on a > >peice of hardware to be able to last more then 5 days in this case > >then to me its not worth the time to go back and forth with having it > >fixed and being with out it for long period of time as most likly it > >would have to be sent to Springer. > > > >BUT I am not puting down APH as they came out with a great product > >that is going to get even greater in time. > > > >Thanks > >Christopher > > >