[bookport] Re: An Alternative to a Pronunciation Dictionary
- From: "Sarah Cranston" <cranston.sarah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 09:24:40 -0500
Sorry about showing my ignorance, but what do you mean by "head size"?
Thanks,
Sarah
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Mike Arrigo
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 8:26 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: An Alternative to a Pronunciation Dictionary
I would agree with this. You can also change things such as =
articulation,
entonation, head size, etc. A speech submenu would be a nice idea.
----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Jeremiah Z. Rogers" <jzr@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Bookport@Freelists. Org" <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 9:39 PM
Subject: [bookport] An Alternative to a Pronunciation Dictionary
> Hi fellow book porters. I've watched, with great interest, the =
different
> ideas about the features and functions you'd like to see added to the =
Book
> Port. Many of you have suggested means to alter what you've called
> pronunciation, but in your examples, you've almost unanimously cited
> instances where the doubletalk speech used the wrong expansion of an
> abbreviation: drive instead of doctor, saint instead of street, etc. =
I've
> suggested, in previous posts, that APH allow Book Port users more =
access
to
> the finer features of the Doubletalk synthesizers: control of =
intonation,
> pause between words, level of enunciation, tone control, etc. All of =
these
> features are available in other devices which utilize Doubletalk =
speech,
and
> as such should be technically available in the hardware presently =
on-board
> your Book Ports. How does this tie into pronunciation of =
abbreviations? I
> believe that there is a means of instructing Doubletalk to simply =
announce
> abbreviations rather than try to parse them. Thus it'd say DR for =
doctor,
ST
> for street or saint, etc. This bit of modification should prove much =
more
> efficient in terms of space utilization, as well as in meeting the =
needs
of
> most users. Were APH to turn its users loose with complete control =
over
all
> of Doubletalk's wide array of configurable features as I've previously
> requested, this feature could simply be one of them and could be part =
of a
> speech parameters submenu off the main menu perhaps. I'll be =
interested to
> read reaction from list members to these thoughts, as well as any =
thoughts
> which might be offered by APH staff on the list. Many thanks in =
advance.
> Jeremiah
>
>
Other related posts:
