I defenitly agree with Carol on the handicapping thing as well as the confermation letters. Warm regards, Brandt Steenkamp Contact me: Skype: brandt.steenkamp007 iMessage: brandt@xxxxxxxxxxx MSN: brandt.86@xxxxxxxx Google talk/AIM: brandt.steenkamp@xxxxxxxxx Twitter @brandtsteenkamp From: blind-chess-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:blind-chess-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carol Harvester Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 4:46 PM To: blind-chess@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [blind-chess] Re: Some Chess Questions Hello Richard, Sorry, this is a corrected message. I lost the last one with "butter fingers"! 1. The enthusiasm of 2on2 did not die. I've been informed that a game is in progress at this time. They adopted the name "Buddy Chess". 2. It sounds interesting. However, as a weaker player, I rather be burned learning to get stronger in the game without a handicap. 3. I concur with Connie's that "both winner and loser should get confirmation letters". Carol ----- Original Message ----- From: R Dinger <mailto:rrdinger@xxxxxxxxxx> To: chess <mailto:blind-chess@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 10:09 PM Subject: [blind-chess] Some Chess Questions Good Evening Chessers, Just a few rambling questions in no particular order. Answer or ignore any of them. 1. What is happening with Carol's idea of mentor or 2on2 chess? The initial enthusiasm seemed to disappear after the first two weeks. 2. Is there any interest in trying to establish a handicapping system and then holding a tournament with odds? Something roughly along the lines of giving the weaker player odds equivalent to a pawn for every 100(?)points of rating difference. 3. I am thinking about changing the game report confirmation message. I want to make it an automatic "form letter" like the Ladder challenge confirmation. What additional information would you like it to show? Richard