[blind-chess] Rebecca, sorry ... Re: Re: More on ... Addition to Problem WAC033
- From: "R Dinger" <rrdinger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <blind-chess@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:59:16 -0700
Hello Rebecca,
Sorry there is a much better answer that forces the issue. Look for forcing
moves and look at Paul's excellent analysis of the problem. Paul moves through
the analysis in stages so you can continue to try solving the problem without
looking at the answer. He analyzes the position, then gives some hints and
finally provides his solution.
Richard
----- Original Message -----
From: Rebecca Blaevoet
To: blind-chess@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 3:00 PM
Subject: [blind-chess] Re: More on ... Addition to Problem WAC033
I haven't been reading other people's solutions, because I didn't want to
cheat. What about this?
1. Rc5 Rd2
2. h4 Qb6
3. c7 Qf6
4. c8-q Qf2+
5. Kh1 Rd1++
On 2010-09-14, at 11:06 AM, R Dinger wrote:
Good Morning Puzzled Problem Solvers,
Apparently I need to clarify my addition to problem WAC033 note. I was
just pointing out there are two White moves that work (by applying the same
tactic), that is attacking the Rook and Queen. The first also gives check
making it probably stronger, but the website correctly points out that 1. Qf4
will also work. Before you all get too upset with me, I am just saying there
are two moves for White.
Sorry for any confusion.
Richard
----- Original Message -----
From: R Dinger
To: chess
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 7:12 PM
Subject: [blind-chess] Addition to Problem WAC033
Hello Puzzlers,
For all you eager problem solvers. Note there are two solutions to the
problem.
Richard
Other related posts:
- » [blind-chess] Rebecca, sorry ... Re: Re: More on ... Addition to Problem WAC033 - R Dinger
