[bksvol-discuss] Re: reward for upgrading software

  • From: "Silvara" <silvara@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 19:18:35 -0400

Hi Charlene:

When I validate a book and I see that it is under 98 percent I will not spend my time trying to rehabilitate it. I believe it a waste of my time and it would be faster rescanning it.

However, I do look through the list of mispelled words to see if the errors are due to dialect, medical terms, foreign words or other intentional misspelling by the author. But when I see single letters appearing 50 times then I know this book is beyond repair. But to ensure that my assumption is correct I also read several pages randomly to see if the sentences are choppy. There are times that single letters are part of the header and therefore can be repaired.

So as you can see I do evaluate every book on an individual basis.
In my opinion, validators should not be afraid to reject a book if the quality is poor. It has taken me some time and many hours of rehabilitating books to get to this point, but now I have no qualms in rejecting a book of poor quality. And as I explained above I don't mean a book with intentional dialect.


Grace
----- Original Message ----- From: "Charlene" <caota@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 6:47 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: reward for upgrading software



You still have to evaluate some things on an individuat basis.  If there
are a lot of medical or scientific terms then the percentage will be
very low because those words aren't in the spelling dictionary.  Also,
if an author has deliberately used bad English or invented words
combined words and such, as a part of the way they have chosen to write
their book, then the percentage is going to be low and it isn't right to
make corrections in those situations.  To just discard a book absed on
that percentage isn't a very good idea.  Further evaluation must be done
to check for the reson why the percentage might be lower than 99%.

Charlene

-----Original Message-----
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of E.
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 4:36 AM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: reward for upgrading software


Take this as a personal opinion. I think anything below 98% should be poor and 98 to 99 % fair. These are doable percentages with today's software. Anything with 99% and above can be excellent. But, for instance, The Abortion Myth was listed as being "excellent" when submitted. It had a rating of 97.5 and contained 228 single occurances of words which I could not figure out. I got it up to 99.5 by the time I sent it in for the new books page. That last 5% was made up of the 228 individual one-time occurances of words. I did not reject it outright since it is not a light reading piece of fiction. If it were, I would have rejected.

The real issue here which noone is interested in addressing because it
is
personally messy is that many of these poor scans come from repeat
folks.  If bookshare staff does nothing to curb it, we validators are
going
to have to send a stronger message by rejecting books.


At 05:06 AM 9/17/2005, you wrote:

Elizabeth and others

I want your feedback on something.  Keeping in mind the caveats
mentioned about ranked spelling, below what threshhold would a book
become fair and below what number would a so-called fair book become
poor and hence rejected?


To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject
line.

To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list
of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject
line.



To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.




--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.1/104 - Release Date: 9/16/2005





-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.1/104 - Release Date: 9/16/2005

To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list of 
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.

Other related posts: