[bksvol-discuss] Re: Verifying a copyright
- From: "Gerald Hovas" <GeraldHovas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:25:59 -0600
Lisa,
The information you need is found in this one statement:
Copyright C 2001 by Barbara Bretton.
COPYRIGHT NAME: Barbara Bretton
COPYRIGHT DATE: 2001
If the form is already filled out this way, then Gustavo just needs a little
convincing for some reason. Either way, include the copyright statement
(which I pasted above) in your comments when you tell him that the
information on the form is correct.
HTH and good luck getting it approved this time.
Gerald
-----Original Message-----
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lisa Belville
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 9:48 AM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Verifying a copyright
Hi, Gerald.
Thanks for the advice. The data on the download page for the book shows
that the submitter and , I guess the other three validators, have used the
original 2001 for the copyright date. I don't think anything has been
added, this is just a large print edition. I always thought we were
supposed to use the latest date, no matter what.
It would be nice if the system would allow for more complete comments
instead of the cryptic ones we have now, not that I'm complaining. <smiles>
Here is what the copyright page looks like in the edition I have:
Copyright C 2001 by Barbara Bretton.
All rights reserved.
This is a work of fiction. Names, characters, places, and incidents
either are the product of the author's imagination or are used
fictitiously, and any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead,
business establishments, events, or locales is entirely coincidental.
Published in 2004 by arrangement with The Berkley Publishing
Group, a member of Penguin Group (USA) Inc.
Wheeler Large Print Softcover.
The text of this Large Print edition is unabridged.
Other aspects of the book may vary from the original edition.
Set in 16 pt. Plantin by Carleen Stearns.
Printed in the United States on permanent paper.
This is followed by the Library of Congress cataloging Data.
Lisa
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gerald Hovas" <GeraldHovas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 9:22 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Verifying a copyright
> Lisa,
>
> Copyright and publication date aren't the same thing, so it's possible
> that
> using the 2004 date may be Gustavo's problem. Use the most recent date
> specified by the copyright statement and the holder associated with that
> date. Also, copy the copyright statement into the comments so Gustavo can
> see it easily when he approves the book. That should help get the book
> approved.
>
> If you have any problems determining what information should be entered on
> the form, then copy the copyright statement into an e-mail and ask the
> list.
>
> BTW, it's new material added to the book that affects the copyright, not
> how
> many pages are used to print the book.
>
> HTH
>
> Gerald
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lisa Belville
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 9:03 AM
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Verifying a copyright
>
> Hi, all.
>
> I just downloaded A Safe Place To Fall by Barbara Bretton.
>
> This book has been kicked back to step one three times because Gustavo had
> questions about the copyright. Since I can't see what the other three
> validators put in the copyright field, and since I don't know specifically
> what is being questioned, I can't say for sure that the information they
> submitted is incorrect.
>
> I just checked with www.copyright.gov, and the book is there with the same
> copyright date of 2001 which appears on the first page of the book I
> downloaded. However, on the second or third page of the book is a
> notation
> that this edition is the large print edition published in 2004 by
> Thorndike
> Press, so it has more pages than the edition listed on the copyright web
> site. Everything else checks out, though.
>
> assuming one or all of the validators confirmed this information, is there
> any reason why the copyright info. would be questioned? I'm thinking that
> perhaps they didn't notice the revised publication date of 2004, which, if
> I
>
> remember correctly is the date we should be using?
>
> Besides that, the book is a good scan and should be easy to validate. I
> just want to be sure I've got the copyright issue straightened out before
> I
> dive in.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Lisa
>
>
>
>
> Please note, Effective Immediately:
> My New E-mail Address is
> lisab12@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list
> of
> available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
>
> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list
> of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
>
>
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
Other related posts:
