[bksvol-discuss] Re: Categories again

  • From: "Roger Loran Bailey" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "rogerbailey81@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
  • To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 22:14:15 -0500

Kim, you are referring to a message from me, but you are not remembering it correctly. First, I did not say that alternate history should not be placed in the science fiction category. That is exactly where it is commonly placed right now in virtually all classification systems and I do not necessarily disagree, at least not yet. What I was talking about was the evolution and origins of the concept of literary genre. It has been suggested that alternate history should become a genre itself and I agree. That would not apply to the examples you give. They are science fiction. My argument deals with the definition of science fiction that I offered earlier. That is, that a science fiction story is one that implicitly asks the question of what if and the word if is followed by a fantastic supposition and that a fantastic supposition is a situation that no human has ever encountered. The science fiction story assumes within its own context that the fantastic supposition is a manifestation of reality as opposed to a manifestation of the supernatural which is the case for fantasy. If the alternate history involves magic or supernatural beings to effect the alternative then it is fantasy and if it involves time travel or multiple universes or something like that which is a fantastic supposition assumed within the context of the story to be a manifestation of reality it is science fiction. Simply positing that history took a slightly different turn that resulted in a different history that serves as the background of a story is not a fantastic supposition though. I remember a piece of graffiti during the Vietnam war that read: Withdrawal, that's what Richard Nixon's father should have done. If Richard Nixon's father had done exactly that at the time that Richard Nixon was conceived then history would have been different. It is not a fantastic supposition because we are right now living in a world with a history that has been shaped by very many people not being born who could have been born and many people who do and have existed who might not have been born. A story that took place in modern day America that had no Richard Nixon in its history would be an alternate history story. If fantastic suppositions were inserted then it might be a science fiction story or a fantasy story depending on the nature of the fantastic suppositions, but without them that is highly questionable. Right now, though, alternate history fiction has not spun off as a genre of its own. It would take more than Bookshare creating a category for it too. In fact, a category for alternate history would be a very small category because there are so few such stories and that is something that probably has a lot to do with its not having spun off as its own genre. If it becomes popular enough it probably will become a genre of its own someday, but for now it is only a subgenre of science fiction. It seems like a stretch to me, but I suppose that the fictional history itself is considered to be the fantastic supposition. Nevertheless, it is speculative fiction in the most literal sense.

On 12/29/2014 7:53 PM, Kim Friedman wrote:
Hi, I don't know who suggested that alternate history novels shouldn't be
put in the science fiction category. I can understand why the sender might
think this; however, I'd say the alternate probability universe story's
primary duty is to deal with the "what-if" question; i.e., what if the south
had won the Civil War. Or what if society were split along gender lines
after a disaster? What would the societies be like and how would men and
women react? There was a series of books by Suzy McKee Charnas which dealt
with this as well as Sherri Tepper's book The Gate to Women's Country. And
where would you put Octavia E. Butler's Patternist series? You have
apparently human entities that live for thousands of years before
life-stretching medical technology or nanotech possited by authors. So I
would say that sf does deal with extrapolated reality based on possible or
impossible future or present-day tech, it doesn't always perform in that
way. Robert Sawyer's Hominid series deals with revival of what were
Neanderthal humans which we can't do now. Although I grant you that
Alternate Probability Universe stories may sound fantastic if you think
there's such a thing as a multiverse and if one could actually do a kind of
time travel, I wouldn't class this as fantasy because there is the
possibility of a technology which may allow for that. Where would you place
H. G. Wells' Time Machine? Would you call that sf or fantasy? I think of it
as a kind of morality tale in the sf category because Wells is imagining
what a far future society would be like given the society of his day. Harry
Turtledove has stories where humans encounter saber-toothed tigers and
hominids which they call sims. To me, this is alternate probability stories
in the science fiction category. If you see something like The Case of the
Toxic Spell Dump by the same author, that's definitely fantasy because the
protagonist is living in a magic-works universe. Besides, what do you make
of Arthor C. Clarke's remark that future technology would appear to be like
magic to people in the past? Where would you place Gene Wolfe's series Book
of the New Sun and Book of the Long Sun? Regards, Kim Friedman.

  To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list of 
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.


To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list of 
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.

Other related posts: