[bksvol-discuss] Re: BSOs For The Last Time

  • From: Cindy Rosenthal <grandcyn77@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 20:48:57 -0800

Well, many Thanks. I look forward to getting to them soon. big smile


On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Larry Lumpkin <llumpkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Hi Cindy.  Susan told me they were BSO’S.  I didn’t mind scanning them
> though.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Cindy Rosenthal
> *Sent:* Saturday, November 23, 2013 9:13 PM
> *To:* bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [bksvol-discuss] Re: BSOs For The Last Time
>
>
>
> Oh. No. he didn't say the  Australian books are BSOs but I'm looking
> forward to doing them, and very soon. I didn't know they'd ever  been done;
> I knew they were requested a long time ago but didn't think they'd ever
> been scanned. etc., added to the collection, or I wouldn't have  asked
> except to get the titles so I could get them from the library to read
> myself; smile.  On this Thanksgiving I give thanks for you and Larry!
>
> Have a wonderful Thanksgiving; I hope you  and  your extended families are
> well.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Susan Lumpkin <slumpkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> I don’t know what Celestial Harmonies or Vivian are, Cindy. HE hasn’t
> mentioned those to me. And, remember, there is still the Australian series.
> They are all BSO’s in case he didn’t mention that.
>
>
>
> Susan
>
>
>
> *From:* bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Cindy Rosenthal
> *Sent:* Saturday, November 23, 2013 5:58 PM
> *To:* bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [bksvol-discuss] Re: BSOs For The Last Time
>
>
>
> oh.Thanks, Susan. as you know I have a lot to do before fixing BSO  books
> but it is something I'd be happy to do when I finish what's on my plate; I
> always made it a point to take books that have been rejected, and now that
> the Poet Project doesn't need any individual's attention, if and when I
> finish the books I currently have to proof I'd be willing; however, I think
> I can rely on Larry's supplying me with projects; (I'm sure he has more
> histories he'd like to scan, and he did say he'd be willing, when he had
> time and could get the book, to do Celestial harmonies (or  Vivian, are you
> doing that one?
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Susan Lumpkin <slumpkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Cindy,
>
>
>
> I’m not sure that Gary means he wants you to do anything. I think he’s
> trying to remember when we upgraded book quality.
>
> Susan
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Cindy Rosenthal
> *Sent:* Saturday, November 23, 2013 5:47 PM
>
> *To:* bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Cc:* Gary Petraccaro
> *Subject:* [bksvol-discuss] Re: BSOs For The Last Time
>
>
>
> I don't know quite what you mean by when we upgraded; when books were
> rejected for being less than good? what is it you'd like to do, or have
> done; make a list of all books in the collection rated Fair or poor and
> have them put on the checkout  list as BSOs?   that sounds good to me I
> could take them as I have time and proof and improve them; (I have quite a
> few things to do first so it would take a while but it's the kind of
> project I'd like.
>
> Cindy
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Gary Petraccaro <garypet130@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> I have gone through most of the books I have and I've found some books from
> the "good" list.  I will get to those when I have time.  But what I'd like
> to do at this point is to narrow down when we upgraded quality.  Does
> anyone
> remember when that was?  I had been using 2005.
> Thanks for the input and Happy Thanksgiving to all.
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list
> of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Other related posts: