[askdba] Re: LOGGING Feature in database

  • From: Rajesh Puneyani <rajpuneyani@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: askdba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 18:00:16 -0500

Thank you very much for the clarification.
I appreciate it a lot.

Regards


On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:12:55 -0700, Justin Cave (DDBC)
<jcave@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> A database-level FORCE LOGGING setting will always take precedence. =20
> 
> 
> 
> Justin Cave  <jcave@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Distributed Database Consulting, Inc.
> http://www.ddbcinc.com/askDDBC
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: askdba-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:askdba-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Rajesh Puneyani
> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 11:35 AM
> To: askdba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [askdba] Re: LOGGING Feature in database
> 
> Thanks Justin,
> 
> But if any object has been created with NOLOGGING Option (before
> Standby was created) then what will be the impact of this table level
> setting on DMLs on that table and ultimately on Standby ?
> 
> I assume that DB Level LOGGING takes the precedence again...Right ?
> 
> Regards
> Rajesh
> 
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:13:29 -0700, Justin Cave (DDBC)
> <jcave@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > A database-level FORCE LOGGING setting will override any NOLOGGING
> > command.  FORCE LOGGING is designed to ensure, for example, that a
> > developer cannot compromise a standby database by doing a NOLOGGING
> > operation.
> >=20
> > Justin Cave  <jcave@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Distributed Database Consulting, Inc.
> > http://www.ddbcinc.com/askDDBC
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: askdba-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:askdba-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of Rajesh Puneyani
> > Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 10:55 AM
> > To: askdba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [askdba] LOGGING Feature in database
> >=20
> > Hi guys,
> >=20
> > This is just to confirm -=3D20
> >=20
> > If I have FORCE LOGGING enabled at the database level then every DDL
> > command I execute (without specifying LOGGING/NOLOGGING option) would
> > be executed using LOGGING option.
> >=20
> > IF I specifically say NOLOGGING in ALTER TABLE ...MODIFY (for example)
> > then NOLOGGING has the priority.
> >=20
> > Pls confirm or clarify.
> > Thanks
> > Rajesh
> >=20
> >
> 
>

Other related posts: