Thank you very much for the clarification. I appreciate it a lot. Regards On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:12:55 -0700, Justin Cave (DDBC) <jcave@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > A database-level FORCE LOGGING setting will always take precedence. =20 > > > > Justin Cave <jcave@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Distributed Database Consulting, Inc. > http://www.ddbcinc.com/askDDBC > > -----Original Message----- > From: askdba-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:askdba-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Rajesh Puneyani > Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 11:35 AM > To: askdba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [askdba] Re: LOGGING Feature in database > > Thanks Justin, > > But if any object has been created with NOLOGGING Option (before > Standby was created) then what will be the impact of this table level > setting on DMLs on that table and ultimately on Standby ? > > I assume that DB Level LOGGING takes the precedence again...Right ? > > Regards > Rajesh > > On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:13:29 -0700, Justin Cave (DDBC) > <jcave@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > A database-level FORCE LOGGING setting will override any NOLOGGING > > command. FORCE LOGGING is designed to ensure, for example, that a > > developer cannot compromise a standby database by doing a NOLOGGING > > operation. > >=20 > > Justin Cave <jcave@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Distributed Database Consulting, Inc. > > http://www.ddbcinc.com/askDDBC > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: askdba-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:askdba-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > On Behalf Of Rajesh Puneyani > > Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 10:55 AM > > To: askdba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [askdba] LOGGING Feature in database > >=20 > > Hi guys, > >=20 > > This is just to confirm -=3D20 > >=20 > > If I have FORCE LOGGING enabled at the database level then every DDL > > command I execute (without specifying LOGGING/NOLOGGING option) would > > be executed using LOGGING option. > >=20 > > IF I specifically say NOLOGGING in ALTER TABLE ...MODIFY (for example) > > then NOLOGGING has the priority. > >=20 > > Pls confirm or clarify. > > Thanks > > Rajesh > >=20 > > > >