Fair enough. I can certainty agree with the last bit. Perhaps I (or someone
else) will start a list soon.
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Edward Wranosky <edwardcw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I would say hybrids are more common, however I wouldn't say because they
are common they are trivial or easier.
Edward
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Daniel Dyck <daniel.dyck.379ba@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hey Lars,
Thanks for sharing my excel sheet :) I was going to share it here soon to
find out if I missed anyone.
As for hybrids, in my opinion, they are fairly more common than liquids,
so I wasn't too interested.
Daniel
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 7:39 AM, doug knight <dougchar001@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Thanks much. Hoping to go in that direction at the University where I
teach.
Doug Knight
On Mar 17, 2017 10:27 AM, "Charlie Garcia" <dragonrider.hhcc@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
MIT had a group build a baloney and N2O hybrid a few years ago. BURPG
had a big hybrid, but they pivoted to their Lotus engine.
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017, 10:17 AM Eric Sims <ericsimsm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Central Connecticut State University has had an ongoing hybrid project
the last few years. I think they tested a beeswax and aluminum fuel and GOX
last year.
-Eric
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 17, 2017, at 9:13 AM, doug knight <dougchar001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What about hybrids?? Anyone working in that direction?
Doug Knight
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 3:56 AM, Lars Osborne <lars.osborne@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I saw this posted on Reddit, I thought members would enjoy seeing the
list, and may be able to contribute suggestions for any not included.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18iKZsQbs8vio4ErjPtZL
4WorFMqISJ6oOK3xb-lyf2E/edit#gid=0
I will certainly be sharing this list with the highschool students that
I mentor.
Thanks,
Lars Osborne
