Thank you for you insightful answer. Can I calibrate my printer using Argyll and Colormunki? How? Sent from iPhone On Oct 13, 2010, at 6:30 PM, Ben Goren <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2010 Oct 13, at 3:11 PM, adam k wrote: > >> I meant to measure ambient light next to my monitor. > > That's what Graeme was referring to. > > In order for a print and a display to match, both must be using the same > illuminant. > > In practice, this means setting up a viewing booth with controlled, known, > measured properties (D50, 120 Lux, for example) and profiling the display to > those exact same parameters. > > May I suggest? > > Preserve your sanity and don't obsess quite so much over screen-to-print > matches. Instead, get the best you can out of both and let the chips fall > where they may. > > If at all possible, ensure that you have good lighting at your workstation. > Indirect daylight is superb. SoLux makes the best bulbs (for certain > definitions of ``best''). > > Profile your display to your personal preference of D50 or D65; this may well > depend on how well your display tolerates being profiled to something other > than its native white point. (You may, in fact, be best off going with the > native white point. It's a judgement call unless you've spent thousands on > your display and at least as much on the rest of your work area.) > > Get the best profile you can for your printer. > > Unless your workstation is set up with excellent viewing conditions, only > evaluate your prints by daylight. Don't even try to compare them to the > display. > > One caveat: if your prints will be displayed in particular lighting > conditions, evaluate the prints in those conditions. Also consider getting a > spectral reading of those conditions and using Argyll to create a custom > printer profile optimized for that lighting. > > Cheers, > > b&