Graeme Gill wrote: > > Nikolay Pokhilchenko wrote: > > > In such cases there may be high device non-linearity, which can be taken > > in account at first step by simple gamma in targen. IMHO the gamma > > coefficient > > for device space in targen can help in difficult cases to achieve the much > > more > > optimal patch spreading and robust chart reading by instrument in > > strip/auto mode. > > Don't worry, the next release will have a gamma value you can apply > in targen to the -s, -g and -m patch generators. > > Graeme Gill. > Okay, it's will be usefull. But as I understood, the device values for spacers and prelaminary device<->XYZ dependency in *.ti1 will be the same. In this case the problem with spacers can still presist. I ask gamma for whole the device space, even for -f patch generator (at least at first step before prelaminary profile).