Try to check with ArgyllCMS: iccgamut -pl Printer.icc iccgamut -pl ISOCoated.icc viewgam -cr -t0 -w Printer.gam -cg -t0.5 -s ISOCoated.gam Compare.wrl You'll get the VRML-visualization file which You can see by VRML-viewer (for example, by Cortona3D Viewer http://www.cortona3d.com/cortona). Mon, 28 May 2012 09:11:36 +0200 "Kamil Tresnak": > Actually not exactly. Proofer gamut was bigger than ISOCoated v2 > (especially in dark areas where problem mainly is /Process Black with > higher "b" value, for example/, gamuts was displayed in Measure Tool), i > am measuring ECI2002 Random, and compare with Fogra39. I do not suppose > any out of gamut colors here, but maybe i am wrong? > > On Mon, 28 May 2012 08:58:19 +0200, Nikolay Pokhilchenko > <nikolay_po@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Have You checked wither the problematic patches are in printer gamut or > > not? Refine procedure can't improve the result with out-of-gamut printer > > color. > > > > Mon, 28 May 2012 08:51:50 +0200 "Kamil Tresnak" wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> My question is about profile tweaking with refine: what amount of > >> correction is possible to expect? My case: proofer system with Epson > >> Stylus Pro 4800, proofer profile created in Argyll, proof with ISOCoated > >> v2 as input profile (absolute colrimetric) give us results with few > >> values > >> with deltaE between 6-11. Abstract profile created with refine tool acc > >> to > >> manual and applied with both colprof and revfix, but i get nearly the > >> same > >> resluts as with original profile in both cases (deltaE differ in > >> tenths). > >> Maybe i am making some systematic error? (Argyll 1.3.5. in this case, > >> but > >> i get similar experience in the past with older version, but dont > >> remeber > >> details). > >> Thank you for any advice, > >> all the best, > >> Kamil > >> > >> > > > -- > Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ > >