Leonard Evens píše v Pá 12. 12. 2008 v 20:12 -0600: > Also, can anyone suggest some other way to check that the profiles are > not unreasonable. Supposedly, Eye of Gnome uses the profile if you set > the X atom _ICC_PROFILE. But there seems to be no way to tell that > program about profiles, so I'm not sure the versions I have are actually > doing that. If I created some bizarre profile with the same > calibration data, I could presumably check if Eye of Gnoe made use of > it, but I don't know how to do that. > EoG should support CM since 2.11.90 (see http://www.linuxcompatible.org/Eye_of_GNOME_2.11.90_s51920.html) However, you can do various tests for yourself (comparing the image in two different viewers - gThumb is CM-non-aware, EoG should be aware) to be sure. To see the if EoG works, _convert_ the test image to a colour space (some wide rgb) significantly different from the monitor space (usually close to sRGB). BTW. EoG has a bug that it behaves as CM-aware app only for images with embedded profiles or "Exif:ColorSpace" equal to "1" (in JPEGs). See bug #554498 in bugzilla http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554498 while it should assume that images without a profile are in sRGB or let the user decide on that. best regards, Milan Knizek knizek (dot) confy (at) volny (dot) cz http://www.milan-knizek.net - about linux and photography