On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 07:13 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Leonard Evens > <len@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 14:42 +1100, Graeme Gill wrote: > >> Leonard Evens wrote: > >> > and then you can choose a display profile. If you leave it blank, you > >> > are supposed to get the system profile. But I get different results > >> > >> Where does it get the "system" profile ? Does it use the > >> X11 _ICC_PROFILE atom ? > > > > That is what I hoped someone here would know something about. I have no > > idea what is meant by firefox's using the systm profile. It is possible > > it is not implemented for Linux. > > It is implemented (at least, on Mandriva Linux builds). But you have > to enable color management in Firefox manually : > -go to about:config > -change gfx.color_management.enabled to "True" > -restart firefox. It doesn't appear to make any difference whether I enable it manually or use the color management addon I found. In either case,gfx.color_management.enabled is set to true. But to tell it about the display, you apparently need to modify gfx.color_management.display_profile to give it the value the search path for the profile. It doesn't seem to matter whether I do that manually using about:config or by choosing preferences to set the display. The addon says that if you leave that blank, it uses the `system' default. But there is a clear difference in what you see if the string is specified or if it isn't. > To check you have color management enabled, I suggest you go to > http://1reflet.skynetblogs.be/post/6632777/profil-colorimetrique-utilisateur-firefox > (sorry, it is in french). If you have working CM, the image will be > yellow, otherwise it will be purple. Just to confuse matters more, it shows up (different shades of) yellow no matter what I do, including not loading the LUT with the calibration data. I can't imagine how Fedora 9 Linux might differ from Mandriva. I am using X11 as provided by a fairly current version of xorg, although it is hard to specify a version since it consists of so many packages. >