[argyllcms] Re: Eye of Gnome Color management
- From: Geert Janssens <info@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:34:55 +0100
(Leonard, I am cc'ing you directly, as you recently indicated not receiving
list messages)
On Saturday 20 December 2008, Leonard Evens wrote:
> xprop -root shows that _ICC_PROFILE has been set. Also, both gimp and
> inkscape make use of it. But the versions I have of eog (under Fedora and
> Ubuntu) don't appear to do so. But it would be nice to be sure about
> that. I presume that any application which does make use of it will
> mention that fact, in its preference settings or elsewhere. That is why
> I would like to see some further explanation of how it is supposed to work
> under eog.
I don't know about preference settings, but I do know how you can verify at
least if eog has been compiled with lcms support or not. That would save you
the trouble to recompile.
There is a linux command ldd, which will show all libraries a given program is
linked to. On my Fedora 10 box,
ldd /usr/bin/eog
will return a long list of libraries. The relevant line is this:
liblcms.so.1 => /usr/lib/liblcms.so.1 (0x02f4c000)
Which indicates that eog is compiled with lcms support.
Of course this doesn't mean eog really does something with the library. It
only means recompilation probably wouldn't change anything.
I am only following this thread in the background, but is Milan Knízek's
suggestion not an explanation for eog's behaviour ?
> BTW. EoG has a bug that it behaves as CM-aware app only for images with
> embedded profiles or "Exif:ColorSpace" equal to "1" (in JPEGs). See bug
> #554498 in bugzilla http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554498
> while it should assume that images without a profile are in sRGB or let
> the user decide on that.
Regards,
Geert
--
Kobalt W.I.T.
Web & Information Technology
Brusselsesteenweg 152
1850 Grimbergen
Tel : +32 479 339 655
Email: info@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
