[argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
- From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:35:18 +1000
Gerhard Fuernkranz wrote:
I guess, the new unstructured dump format for CLUT tables isn't really
desired, is it? ;-)
I'm not very impressed by the warnings out of VC++ /W4. It objected to
this:
unsigned int count = 4;
int j;
for (j = 0; j < count; j++)
do stuff
because j and count are a signed/unsigned mismatch
but not this
unsigned int count = 4;
unsigned int j;
for (j = count-1; j >= 0; j--)
do stuff
in which j >= 0 is always true.
gcc didn't notice it always true either.
thanks,
Graeme.
Other related posts:
