[argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
- From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 02:16:16 +1000
Gerhard Fuernkranz wrote:
you may want to try "-Wextra", see e.g.
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.0.3/gcc/Warning-Options.html#Warning-Options
This should also result in a warning if
"An unsigned value is compared against zero with `<' or `>='"
Yes, this does the right thing. I though "-Wall" was supposed to
turn on "all" warnings - apparently not.
I've updated the snapshot again - it's now identified as 3584989 bytes.
Graeme Gill.
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
- From: Klaus Karcher
- References:
- [argyllcms] "Development in progress" update
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] "Development in progress" 2nd update
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
- From: Gerhard Fuernkranz
- [argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
- From: Gerhard Fuernkranz
- [argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
- From: Gerhard Fuernkranz
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] "Development in progress" 2nd update
- » [argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
- » [argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
- » [argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
- » [argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
- » [argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
- » [argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
- » [argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
- » [argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
you may want to try "-Wextra", see e.g. http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.0.3/gcc/Warning-Options.html#Warning-Options
This should also result in a warning if "An unsigned value is compared against zero with `<' or `>='"
Yes, this does the right thing. I though "-Wall" was supposed to turn on "all" warnings - apparently not.
- [argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
- From: Klaus Karcher
- [argyllcms] "Development in progress" update
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] "Development in progress" 2nd update
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
- From: Gerhard Fuernkranz
- [argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
- From: Gerhard Fuernkranz
- [argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: "Development in progress" 2nd update
- From: Gerhard Fuernkranz