On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 21:18 +0100, Karl H. Beckers wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 31.12.2008, 10:27 -0600 schrieb Leonard Evens: > > You should give more details, e.g., your operating system, your type > > of > > monitor, which version of gimp you are using, etc. > > > > I noticed that when I opened the test image, which I saved from > > firefox, > > in gimp, I was queried about whether or not I wanted to use the > > embedded > > profile as my working space. In my case, it didn't seem to matter a > > whole lot which I chose to do. But which choice did you make? If > > you > > weren't queried, you may have reconfigure gimp preferences to query > > you. > > > > You can also try other applications which use color management. Eye > > of Gnome is one such. Another I've had good luck with is inkscape. > > Leonard, Lars, et. al., > > yes, gimp gives me the prompt for what to do with the embedded profile, > and I kept it. Also, I don't think it's a problem with gimp and the > image, because I'm also in this situation with pics straight out of my > DSLR as sRGB RAW via uraw. I was only giving this test image to provide > a more easily reproducible test. > > As far as eog is concerned, I get the same error and the image opens > fine. I am not, however, sure that that means it does color mgmt. better > than gimp. I suspect, it just completely ignores the profile due to the > error, because the image as eog displays it looks identical to the image > displayed in gthumb, firefox, or f-spot. > > The system I'm on is: ubuntu intrepid i386, argyll 1.0.3 from the > precompiled binaries on a Toshiba M9 with nvidia graphics, Eye-1 Display > 2 colorimeter. > > > Thanks, > > Karl. > > I've been comparing the image in eog, gimp, g-thumb, inkscape, and firefox. They all look fairly similar, but I think that is because my calibration is doing most of the work. But the (presumably) color managed versions (gimp, inkscape, and possibly eog) do look a bit more saturated than the non-color managed versions (gthumb and firefox). I prefer the color managed versions. I am at a loss to explain why gimp is behaving as it does for you. I believe that gimp may do its lown color management rather than simply relying on lcms, but I'm not sure aout that. In any case, I don't see any radical differences like what you describe. I hope someone more knoweldgeable than I will come up with a plausible conjecture. -- Leonard Evens <len@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Mathematics Department, Northwestern University