Graeme Gill wrote: > Gerhard Fuernkranz wrote: >> is there a reason why icclink -G does not support a relative >> colorimetric intent without gamut mapping (similar to -ia, but >> relative)? > > Because it's necessary to exactly map the white points, and relying on > the Jab transform alone doesn't guarantee this. (I think I made > this change relatively recently). I was rather thinking of a "regular" relative colorimetric conversion, w/o mapping between different viewing conditions (since this is not part of an ICC relative colorimetric conversion), and even w/o any white point mapping (since the tables in the profile are already relative anyway), so that only the out-of-gamut clipping is possibly done in CIECAM02 space (for the destination profile only), but where unlike for "icclink -s" the device link is computed from the A2B1 table of the destination profile. -Gerhard