[argyllcms] Re: Are these good SpectraView II Results (NEC3090 with ColorMunki)

  • From: liu logo <oneninty2002@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: dh003i@xxxxxxxxx, argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:45:38 +0800 (CST)

Recommad to  Set the Uniformity level to 3. 




________________________________
寄件者: David Heinrich <dh003i@xxxxxxxxx>
收件者: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
寄件日期: 2011/1/11 (二) 7:20:37 AM
主 旨: [argyllcms] Re: Are these good SpectraView II Results (NEC3090 with 
ColorMunki)

I'll have to check, but most likely the black level was 0.36, not
0.036. I manualy transcribed the results. The low contrast ratio may
be because I had SVII tell the LCD to apply the maximum level of color
uniformity corection?

On 1/10/11, J獺nos, T籀th F. <janos666@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think it's fine but the report itself is faulty:
>
> ///
> Display Luminance: 79.4 cd/m^2
> Black Level: 0.036 cd/m^2
> Contrast Ratio: 222:1
> ///
>
> What?
>
> 79.4 / 0.036 = 2205:1
>
> Again: What???
>
>
> 222:1 would be too low (but can be real if you apply many compensations)
> while 2205:1 would be too high (may be it's real but I doubt that).
>


-- 
Social sciences can never use experience to verify their statements --
Ludwig von Mises


      

Other related posts: